Select Page

Federal Civil Procedure—Government May Intervene and Invoke State Secrets Privilege for Defendant Company that Allegedly Assisted CIA—Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc., 614 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2010)(en banc), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 2442 (2011)

The United States judiciary will defer to the executive branch on matters of foreign policy and national security when evaluating the need for secrecy.  The state secrets doctrine, a common-law evidentiary privilege, permits the government to bar the disclosure of...

Constitutional Law—Eighth Circuit Permits Broad Protective Sweep During Execution of Arrest Warrant Inside Suspect’s Home—United States v. Green, 560 F.3d 853 (8th Cir. 2009)

The Fourth Amendment’s proscription against unreasonable searches and seizures effectively limits the federal government’s power to invade an individual’s privacy.  Under certain circumstances, however, courts have deemed searches that protect a police officer or...

Criminal Law—Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Fails to Require Statistical Analysis for Nonexclusion DNA Test Results—Commonwealth v. Mattei, 920 N.E.2d 845 (Mass. 2010)

Massachusetts grants judges broad discretion when determining the relevancy of evidence.  The Massachusetts Guide to Evidence Section 403 (Section 403) states that relevant evidence is admissible unless the trial judge believes the probative value of the evidence is...

Criminal Law-Fourth Circuit Holds Retroactive Application of Federal Sentencing Guidelines Amendments Violates Ex Post Facto Clause-United States v. Lewis, 606 F.3d 193 (4th Cir. 2010)

The Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits retroactive laws that alter the definition of or increase the penalty for a criminal offense.  Accordingly, the use of amended sentencing guidelines at the time of sentencing, which call for a...